AMVETS in Action

Supersized Veterans’ Bill Promises Much – Mostly Broken Promises

By Stewart Hickey, National Executive Director for American Veterans – AMVETS

There are some organizations holding back and asking the hard questions about Senator Bernie Sanders’ (I–VT) supersized veterans’ bill, S.1982 (formerly S.1950, the Comprehensive Veterans Health and Benefits and Military Retirement Pay Restoration Act of 2014). We at AMVETS and Concerned Veterans for America (CVA) certainly appreciate the good intentions of Senator Sanders in introducing S.1982 and those of our colleagues for supporting it. Many have rallied to the flag of S.1982 in large part due to the prospect of the reinstatement of COLA benefits without fully examining the details and practicality of the bill.

While we agree the bill addresses many critical issues and recommends important solutions for our veterans we do not support this bill for several reasons. First, it would be morally irresponsible and fiscally unsound, given the historically volatile situation in Afghanistan, to hang the funding for such robust legislation on any potential “peace dividend.” Throwing more money — upwards of $30 billion, and taken from war funds no less — at a failing department will only make matters worse.

This kitchen sink-like bill also endeavors to be all things to all veterans, and is very enticing to all of us ‘Veterans Service Organizations’ as the panacea for all of our legislative agendas. The problem is, in its current configuration, it has little to no chance of passage. It’s just too “pie in the sky” and has lacks the power base to hold VA accountable for providing excellent care and services to veterans currently accessing the system.

At present there’s a distinct lack of bi-partisan support for S.1982. Inviting political infighting to get in the way could potentially relegate this legislation to no more than a political exercise. There is so much good they could do by supporting legislation that has potential for bi-partisan support and passage. Sen. Ayotte’s (R-KY) S.1977, for example, seeks to repeal section 403 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (repealing the military retirement COLA cuts) while not adding additional deficit spending. With similar bi-partisan support is Sen. Blumenthal’s (D-CT) S.1281, the Veterans and Servicemembers Employment Rights and Housing Act of 2013. This nearly cost-neutral legislation would make it illegal to discriminate against individuals based on their military or veteran status and give veterans legal recourse. In fact, twelve states have passed state laws similar to S.1281 to protect vets.

The passage of S.1982 would unfortunately condemn S.1281 to a mere study, the Washington term for make work, kill slowly, or death by committee. At any rate it will be delayed at best for years and at worst killed off quietly while our veterans continue to have problems with employment and housing.

We all want what’s best for the veterans community, and many of the provisions in S.1982 are positive. However, ‘bigger’ doesn’t mean ‘better,’ and the Sanders bill further expands a VA system that is already overwhelmed and cannot meet the current needs of veterans. Before overcommitting the Department of Veterans Affairs and subjecting our veterans to more broken promises, Congress should rally on legislation that keep the promises already made.

Media Contact: David Gai, (301) 683-4035,

A leader since 1944 in preserving the freedoms secured by America’s armed forces, AMVETS provides support for veterans and the active military in procuring their earned entitlements, as well as community service and legislative reform that enhances the quality of life for this nation’s citizens and veterans alike. AMVETS is one of the largest congressionally-chartered veterans’ service organizations in the United States, and includes members from each branch of the military, including the National Guard and Reserves. For more infor¬ma¬tion about the Veterans and Servicemembers Employment Rights and Housing Act of 2013, visit

Share:Share on FacebookShare on TumblrTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on Google+Share on LinkedIn

5 thoughts on “Supersized Veterans’ Bill Promises Much – Mostly Broken Promises

  1. Stop sending me mail asking for more money. I will not be giving you any more. Rejecting sb 1982 is wrong. NO MORE.

    1. Research the bill. My wife has and I’m glad they voted against it. It would of cut our pay again.

  2. Just reading this while checking into this bill more, as republicans are hypocritically now “outraged” at the problems at the VA. I am shocked that you didn’t support this bill. Stating that it’s a waste to throw money at a “failing system” is backwards on its face. The VA “fails” in so many way due to being overloaded with patients to care for. How in the world are they supposed to care for so many veterans if they are NOT FUNDED PROPERLY?

  3. What the heck is this BS? Are you seriously towing the Republican line in response to a bill that has the potential to do so much good?

    I didn’t realize that your organization was a political one when I made my pledge a few days ago. Guess I’ll have to call and cancel.

  4. Major Hickey,

    It would appear, from reading this piece, that you have decided to oppose this legislation based on partisan considerations.

    I was unaware that AMVETS was a political organization. I was under the impression that it was an organization aimed at assisting Veterans.

    Thank you for clearing that up for me.

    In a surprising coincidence, I was just contacted by AMVETS a few days ago, and made a modest donation pledge to your organization. As a veteran myself, I often make such donations to various organizations.

    It would seem that, when the envelope arrives, I will now have to respond with a check for 50 cents, to cover the postage, and a letter explaining why I will not actually be making said donation this time around.

    -J. Cobb
    New York

Comments are closed.